Supreme Court Rules Immediate Arrest Mandatory After Bail Rejection

The Supreme Court has ruled that individuals must be arrested immediately after their pre-arrest bail is rejected, marking a major step against delays in judicial compliance.

Interim protection is not automatic

In a four-page written judgment led by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, the court clarified that simply filing a petition in the Supreme Court does not offer protection from arrest. “Interim protection is not automatic and requires formal permission from the court.”

Police Failed to Act for Six Months

The case involved accused Zahid Khan and others, whose bail pleas were rejected by the Lahore High Court. Despite this, the police took no action for over six months, prompting the Supreme Court to highlight it as a serious lapse.

“Timely implementation of court orders is the foundation of justice”

The judgment labeled the police delay as a “hindrance to justice,” stressing the need for strict and prompt enforcement of judicial decisions.

IG Punjab Admits Negligence

During the proceedings, Punjab’s Inspector General acknowledged the delay and assured the court that a circular would be issued to ensure proper action is taken in the future.

Pending Appeals Don’t Prevent Arrest

The court clarified that a pending appeal does not justify avoiding arrest. “Even if an appeal is pending, arrest cannot be avoided unless a court specifically orders otherwise.”

Petition Withdrawn

The court disposed of the case after the petitioner’s lawyer decided to withdraw the appeal.